Your Tax Dollars at Work
Footnotes
These note explain the derivation of the percentage data in the third
column of the table shown under "Mayhem".
Figures are in $ billion per year unless otherwise shown.
Item |
Federal (1) |
State & Local |
Total (3) |
Generate Poverty |
450 |
360 (4) |
810 = 25% |
Create Injustice |
36 |
144(5) |
180 = 6% |
Wage War |
324 |
0 |
324 = 10% |
Warp Young Minds |
0 |
300(6) |
300 = 9% |
Hurt the elderly |
666 |
0 |
666 = 21% |
Plunge into debt |
242 |
98(7) |
340 = 10% |
Everything else |
82 |
538(8) |
620 = 19% |
Total |
$1,800 |
$1,440(2) |
$3,240 |
Note 1: Federal data is taken from the inside back page of the
IRS 1040 Instruction Booklet.
Note 2: State & Local is much less precise. The methodology is
to take the total ($1,440B) as being 4/5 of the Federal spend, then
allocate it among the seven categories as shown in the Notes below.
Note 3: The total sums the $ figures across, then derives the
percentage - which appears on the table under "Mayhem" on the main page.
Note 4:"Welfare" spending varies greatly, from close to zero in
rural towns in New Hampshire, to a huge portion of the total spend in
major Northern cities. Lacking better data, I took the same percentage
(25) of the total spend as applies for the Federal case.
Note 5: "Services" of detecting, prosecuting and incarcerating
those convicted of having broken government laws varies widely too; a
typical State may spend 7% on this item but small Towns, rather more
- since 24 hour police coverage can be expensive pro rata. I took 10%.
Note 6: One sixth of the population is aged between 6 and 18,
and the per-student annual cost I took as a conservative $7,000.
Hence (1/6 x 260M x 7K =) $300 billion.
Note 7: I made the generous assumption that when States, cities
and towns borrow, they are half as fiscally irresponsible as the Feds;
hence their total debt load is half, relative to their total spend
(four fifths.) Hence (242 x 0.5 x 0.8 =) $98 billion.
Note 8: This is just the difference between $1,440 billion
and the sum of the items above. It may be a bit high (ie, those others
are too low) but local governments spend huge amounts on roads and
other items that would show a genuine demand in a free society. Note
that to the extent it is high, this attributes too much of our tax
dollars to activities which are in some respects useful; that is, too
little is attributed to those which are useless and destructive.
Back to Main Page